Starbucks has built its brand on its ability to deliver a consistent customer experience. When you ask someone what they love about Starbucks, it’s always the same answer—“I know what to expect.”

Why then would a company with such a recognized brand promise veer away from the very thing customers value?

With its recent decision to open “locally-branded” coffee shops, Starbucks has completely abandoned its brand (and received much public criticism for the move). Aside from the fact that the new stores will not be named “Starbucks,” they bear almost no resemblance to the brand experience we’re all used to. Instead, they’ve taken on a Bohemian coffee-shop look and feel, adding alcohol to the menu and showcasing local artists from musicians to poets. To me, the move seems very off-brand and inauthentic—especially when you hear stories that Starbucks sent its employees to neighboring coffee hangouts, like Victrola, to jot down ideas and thoughts in notebooks labeled “observations.”

What are your thoughts on Starbucks’s new strategy? Do you agree with Adam Hanft of Fast Company (and me) that this is a poor and off-brand decision? Or do you, like John Moore of Brand Autopsy, believe it’s a brilliant learning opportunity to help Starbucks put its brand back on track?

-Hiley Spaet

Share on Facebook